enjavi

IELTS Writing Task 2: Bài mẫu Band 7 về Giáo dục

Task 2 Band 7 Giáo dục

Đề bài

Dạng bài: Câu hỏi kép

"Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on society?"

Bài viết gốc

Nhấp vào văn bản được đánh dấu để xem gợi ý

In recent time, it is observed that the number of students enrolling for Science or Mathematics in higher education is decreasing all over the world. There are plenty of reasons that are causing this decline which will affect the society negatively. In this essay, I will discuss why the number of pupils is deacreasing who prefer science stream and what will be the impacts on a community if it continues. The main reason of this situation is lack of trained science and mathematics teachers. STEM teachers are not able to kindle the joy of learning among students. If students do not get proper foundation and motivation in their school life to pursue STEM subjects, they will develop Math or Science phobia. Subsequently, they will rather prefer other streams to complete their higher education. Eventually, this situation will impact the scociety in many ways. Firstly, there would be scarcity of doctors all over the world which will affect health sector dramatically. Eventually, people will suffer with many health problems. Secondly, if students do not take STEM subjects in university, there will not be STEM teachers to teach future generation. According to me, government must take firm steps to avoid these situations in future. There must be some training program to keep STEM teachers up to date to enhance their teaching. This will enable teachers to make science subjects enjoyable for students, for instance, teachers may incorporate technology in the learning process. To conclude, I believe that government and teachers should take the resposibility to create the conducive environment to learn these subjects in fun way. This will, eventually, increase the number of students enrolling for STEM subjects in recent future. Otherwise, it may have negative impacts on society which will not be a good sign for any country.

Đánh giá từ Nomad English

Điểm Band tổng thể 7

Trả lời đề bài

7

Tính liên kết và mạch lạc

7

Vốn từ vựng

7

Ngữ pháp và độ chính xác

6.5

Nhận xét từ giám khảo

Bài viết này đáp ứng cả hai phần của câu hỏi và trình bày ý tưởng theo trình tự logic. Phần mở bài cung cấp luận điểm rõ ràng, dù câu cuối quá dài dòng và có lỗi chính tả ('deacreasing'). Việc chia đoạn rõ ràng, với nguyên nhân và hệ quả được tách biệt. Việc sử dụng 'STEM' cho thấy nhận thức về chủ đề, và vốn từ vựng nhìn chung phù hợp ('scarcity', 'conducive', 'subsequently'). Tuy nhiên, một số cụm từ mang tính khẩu ngữ ('According to me', 'fun way') và có lỗi chính tả ('scociety', 'resposibility'). Ngữ pháp chủ yếu chính xác với phạm vi cấu trúc khá, dù một số vấn đề về mạo từ và trật tự từ vẫn còn. Đoạn thân bài trộn lẫn hệ quả với giải pháp, làm giảm nhẹ tính mạch lạc cấu trúc.

Bài viết mẫu Band 9

Đây là cách một bài viết Band 9 trả lời cùng một câu hỏi:

Something quietly alarming is happening in universities worldwide: the sciences are losing ground. Fewer students each year commit to studying biology, physics, mathematics, or chemistry at degree level, and the roots of this decline reach deep into how education systems prepare—or fail to prepare—young people for scientific thinking. The problem begins long before university application deadlines. In many secondary schools, science is taught by generalists who may hold a teaching qualification but lack genuine subject expertise. A physics class led by someone whose own training stopped at introductory level is unlikely to convey the discipline's intellectual excitement. Students who spend their formative years memorising textbook definitions without ever conducting a meaningful experiment arrive at university viewing science as tedious busywork. Those who might have developed a passion for research never get the spark. Meanwhile, career guidance in schools overwhelmingly favours fields with visible, well-compensated entry points—accounting, software development, marketing—while career paths in pure science remain poorly explained and easy to dismiss as unrealistic. The ripple effects of declining science enrolment touch virtually every part of modern life. Hospitals need pharmacists, pathologists, and biomedical researchers; a sustained drop in science graduates translates directly into staff shortages that compromise patient care. Agricultural research, essential for adapting food systems to shifting climates, depends on soil scientists and geneticists who are increasingly difficult to recruit. Even national defence has a scientific dimension: countries that cannot train their own engineers and physicists must purchase military technology abroad, creating strategic vulnerabilities that no amount of diplomatic skill can entirely offset. The most effective response would combine investment at every stage of the pipeline. Well-funded specialist teacher training, laboratory facilities that allow genuine experimentation in schools, undergraduate research placements that connect science students with working professionals, and postgraduate stipends competitive enough to make a doctorate financially rational—together, these measures would rebuild the bridge between curiosity and career that too many education systems have allowed to crumble.

Nhận phản hồi ngay cho bài viết của bạn

Hệ thống AI của chúng tôi chấm bài IELTS trong vài giây — với chỉnh sửa chi tiết như trên.

Dùng thử miễn phí