IELTSライティング Task 2: バンド5.5 エッセイサンプル — 社会
エッセイ問題
"Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development? Discuss both views and give your opinion."
提出されたエッセイ
ハイライトされたテキストをクリックして提案を表示
Athletes to be on the top need to have high-end facilities that a country can provide for them to be able to improve their strengths and skills. Some government opted to build facilities exclusively for training athletes for international sports goals, instead of building establishments for everyone to have the liberty of using the sports facilities. From my perspective, this phenomena is a negative development.
Being able to discover an individual's potential, they need to have a support from any form of sources. Establishing sports facilities can help people to discover their own interests, talents and even skills in learning new things. Centers which offer utilities, equipments and state-of-the-art tools that provide learning sports can be a great advantage to people who want to train themselves on the things that can awaken their interests when it comes to sports.
In addition, building these kind of establishments, not only for the purpose to train top athletes, but also for people to immerse themselves to different variaties of activities can help them socialize more with their peers. This is extremely beneficial that aside from doing sports that they are into, they get to play along with peers, discover one's potential and also learning from one another. Furthermore, these individuals can also have the future to be one of top athletes that a country can have.
In conclusion, although there are countries that chose to have their sports establishments exclusively for training top athletes, I assert that these that actions can be lead to negative feedbacks. Government should allow everyone the privilege to use and avail facilities that can hone an individual's talents, skills and dexterity when it comes to sports and this can also be immensely benefical for both country and citizen alike.
Nomad English 評価
タスク達成度
6
一貫性と結束性
5.5
語彙力
5.5
文法の幅と正確性
5
試験官フィードバック
このエッセイは二面的な問題について明確な立場を示し、関連する例でサポート論を発展させています。著者は公共のスポーツ施設を提供する理由をうまく特定しています。しかし、多数の文法的および語彙的エラーが応答を弱めています。'Athletes to be on the top'や'this phenomena'などの表現にはエラーが含まれており、文法的正確さに影響します。'variaties'という単語はスペルが間違っており、'building these kind'のような不自然な構成は主語と動詞の一致の問題を示しています。また、'these that actions can be lead to'などの表現は混乱を招き、文法的に正しくありません。
バンド9 モデル回答
同じ問題に対するバンド9の模範回答：
The debate surrounding whether governments should invest in elite training facilities or public recreational sports infrastructure presents a meaningful challenge for policymakers. While elite athlete development has merit, I contend that prioritizing multipurpose facilities benefiting the broader population represents a superior policy approach.
Proponents of specialized elite training facilities argue that such investment cultivates world-class athletes capable of securing international accolades for their nations. High-performance centers with specialized equipment and expert coaching can accelerate athlete development. However, this perspective overlooks the substantial societal benefits of democratized sports access.
Public sports facilities generate transformative social outcomes. First, they enable talent identification across diverse populations, expanding the potential talent pool beyond affluent demographics. Second, widespread access promotes health and fitness, reducing public healthcare burdens. Third, and perhaps most importantly, community sports facilities strengthen social cohesion by facilitating intergenerational interaction and building shared civic spaces.
Moreover, these facilities need not be mutually exclusive. Nations can designate specialized training hubs within broader public infrastructure, thereby serving both elite development and community engagement simultaneously.
In conclusion, while elite athlete preparation warrants investment, governments should prioritize inclusive public sports infrastructure. Such an approach simultaneously nurtures extraordinary athletic talent while cultivating healthier, more cohesive communities—an outcome far more beneficial to society than elite-focused spending alone.
あなたのエッセイも即座にフィードバック
AI評価システムがIELTSライティングを数秒で採点 — 上記のような詳細な添削付き。
無料で試す